It’s free at the time of this writing, but will eventually disappear behind a paywall you can find it here, along with the accompanying article by Drs.

They’ve reproduced the manuscript, typos and all, and it’s available to read in The Edith Wharton Review. Laura Rattray, two scholars from Georgian Court University and the University of Glasgow, respectively, who began discussing the little-known work at a conference and subsequently examined a manuscript at the Harry Ransom Center at the University of Texas, Austin.

The Shadow of a Doubt has made the news thanks to the efforts of Dr. However, the story behind Wharton's play, The Shadow of a Doubt, and its reemergence into the public consciousness is more complicated than the oversimplified narrative of a “lost” play being plucked from oblivion by intrepid scholars, and it points to the messy way in which we build and organize our ostensibly tidy literary and theatrical canons. The discovery of a neglected work by Edith Wharton has understandably made headlines in a number of high-profile publications, in particular The New Yorker.

Rotten tomatoes shadow of a doubt